Starzbet Cyprus review: what the dated records establish
Assessment at a glance
| Question | Evidence available | Practical conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Is the exact domain on an NBA list? | Yes. The captured blocking list contains starzbet.com. | Treat the domain as a material Cyprus warning. |
| Is a matching Cyprus Class B entry established? | No literal Starzbet or Obsidian Titan entry appeared among the 13 entries displayed on the checked page. | Cyprus authorisation is not established by the supplied records. |
| Is there a foreign register association? | An exact snapshot dated 8 October links the domain and stated company to an Anjouan licence number. | This does not amount to Cyprus permission or a payout guarantee. |
| Were payments or support tested? | No account, deposit, withdrawal or support interaction occurred. | Performance claims remain unverified. |
The assessment is not a recommendation to register, deposit or attempt to circumvent blocking. It is limited to the exact records and dates described below.
The exact Cyprus blocking-list observation
The strongest local finding is domain-specific. The NBA text list was captured on 11 October 2026, carried the header “Last updated 05 October 2026”, and included the exact domain starzbet.com. This is an official, dated observation about that domain.
Its scope matters. Inclusion does not demonstrate who controls every possible alias, establish that an entire company is fraudulent, or prove that a particular user could or could not connect from Cyprus. It also says nothing about whether any individual withdrawal succeeded or failed. No VPN, DNS or other access workaround should be used to reinterpret or evade the local signal.
Readers comparing domains can use the Starzbet domain and licence check for a focused explanation of exact-host matching and why a similar name is not enough.
What the Cyprus Class B register showed
On 11 October, the NBA Class B page displayed 13 licensed-bookmaker company, trade-name and domain entries. Neither the literal name Starzbet nor Obsidian Titan appeared in those displayed entries. This narrowly scoped check does not establish that every registry, historical record or possible alias was searched.
No licence belonging to another bookmaker can be transferred to this operator. The NBA’s general FAQ also distinguishes Class B online betting from online casino and slot products, which it describes as excluded from that licensing context. Consequently, the presence of a sports-and-casino interface cannot be treated as proof that all displayed products fall under a Cyprus Class B permission.
Foreign licence statement versus dated register record
The observed site footer declared Obsidian Titan Limited, company number 16394 and licence ALSI-202602052-FI2. Those were first-party statements visible on 11 October, not independent confirmation of company registration, current licence status or Cyprus permission.
A separate Anjouan register snapshot dated 8 October 2026 showed Obsidian Titan Limited with valid/B2C status, the same licence number, an issue date of 28 February 2026, an expiry date of 27 February 2027, and starzbet.com among the listed domains. This provides a dated published association, but the register was not freshly verified on 11 October.
| Record | What it supports | What it does not support |
|---|---|---|
| Operator footer, observed 11 October | The operator displayed a company name, number and licence identifier. | Independent company verification, current regulatory status or Cyprus approval. |
| Anjouan register snapshot, dated 8 October | A published association between the stated entity, licence and exact domain on that date. | Fresh 11 October status, independently authenticated governmental authority, local permission or guaranteed payments. |
| NBA Class B page, checked 11 October | No literal Starzbet or Obsidian Titan entry among the 13 displayed entries. | A universal search of every registry, alias or historical identity. |
The foreign record must therefore remain separate from the Cyprus evidence. It cannot establish local eligibility, and other domains appearing in that foreign register should not be attributed to the same controller without their own evidence.
Interface and Cyprus eligibility
A Starzbet-branded sports and casino interface at the exact host was observed through a foreign VPS on 11 October. It rendered in US English. That confirms only that an interface was returned in that particular environment. It does not establish access from Cyprus, eligibility for a Cyprus resident, safety, target-market permission or acceptance of local customers.
No account was created and no terms were accepted. There is therefore no first-hand evidence about registration screening, age checks, location controls, account restrictions or the treatment of a Cyprus address. The domain-level NBA entry remains more relevant to the local assessment than interface language or availability from a foreign server.
Payments, withdrawals and KYC remain untested
The interface made marketing or FAQ statements about fast or instant payouts, generally having no platform payout fees, one-time identity verification, cards, cryptocurrency and round-the-clock support. None of these claims was tested. There is no verified evidence here for Cyprus-specific payment rails, fees, limits, processing times, required documents or support performance.
No deposit or withdrawal was attempted, and no bank or payment-provider record was obtained. A useful evidence file for any future dispute would ordinarily preserve dated requests, account messages, transaction references and bank records, but that is general record organisation—not a tested Starzbet procedure or a promise of recovery. The withdrawal evidence check separates observed claims from facts that would require transaction-level proof.
Policy links and desktop application claims
The requested KYC address returned a navigation and marketing shell carrying a “Player Complaints and Dispute Resolution” title rather than complete retrieved KYC terms. The requested privacy-policy address returned the same type of shell, not a complete privacy, complaint or withdrawal policy. An HTTP 200 response only shows that the server returned something; it does not authenticate the missing policy contents.
As a result, document requirements, data handling, complaint stages and withdrawal conditions cannot be stated from those responses. Nor was a technical privacy audit conducted.
The interface also labelled an application for macOS and Windows. No package was downloaded or installed, and no publisher, signature, distribution channel or security property was verified. The label is not evidence that software is safe or malicious. It does not justify recommending an install source, mirror or APK.
Complaints and safeguards: limits of the local framework
The NBA FAQ describes complaint handling and protected player-account arrangements in the context of licensed bookmakers. Those general descriptions cannot be transferred to Starzbet when the available evidence does not establish it as a Cyprus-licensed bookmaker. They are not proof of mediation, reimbursement, account protection or recovery rights for a Starzbet customer.
No documented user complaint, regulator decision or withdrawal failure was supplied for this assessment. Equally, the absence of such a record here should not be presented as proof that complaints do not exist. The defensible conclusion is narrower: the exact domain has a dated local blocking-list entry, while key operational and consumer-protection questions remain open.
nba.gov.cy · nba.gov.cy · nba.gov.cy · anjouangaming.com
Frequently asked questions
What does the exact NBA blocking entry establish?
It establishes that the NBA list captured on 11 October 2026, with a header dated 5 October 2026, contained the exact entry starzbet.com. It does not establish fraud, control of aliases, failed payouts or the result of local connectivity testing.
Does the Anjouan record make Starzbet licensed in Cyprus?
No. The 8 October snapshot provides a dated foreign-register association between the stated entity, licence number and domain. It is not a Cyprus licence, fresh 11 October verification or a guarantee of payment or consumer recovery.
Were Starzbet withdrawals, KYC or support tested?
No. There was no account, deposit, withdrawal, identity-verification process or support interaction. Claims about speed, fees, payment methods, one-time KYC and continuous support remain operator statements rather than verified outcomes.
Is the advertised desktop application verified as safe?
No. Labels for macOS and Windows were observed, but no package, publisher, signature, store listing, installation or security property was checked. The evidence supports neither a safety endorsement nor a malware allegation.